Category Archives: North Korea

C41 PAKISTAN C4I IRAN CHINA INDIA INDIA-CHINA NAVAL COMPETITION IRAN NORTH KOREA NUCLEAR COMMAND AND CONTROL PAKISTAN PAUL BRACKEN RUSSIA SECOND NUCLEAR AGE SOUTH ASIA UNITED STATES

Perspectives on the Second Nuclear Age

by Ehsan Ahrari on April 29, 2013, No Comments

The threat of the outbreak of a nuclear war between the two superpowers has ended with the implosion of the Soviet Union and the end of the Cold War.  However, the threat of a military conflict escalating into a nuclear conflagration remains quite palpable in the "second nuclear age."  That is the basic theme of Paul Bracken's, The Second Nuclear Age: Strategy, Danger, and the New Power Politics.  There are not too many books that are more persuasive in establishing the argument involving the end of one historical era–the first nuclear age–and the beginning of another–the second nuclear age than this one.  It is also insightful in describing how distinctive the second nuclear age has already been from the first one and why it is going to be more conflict prone and trickier to "manage" than the previous one.   (more…)
BINYAMIN NETANYAHU CHINA IRAN ISRAEL NORTH KOREA UNITED STATES

Nuclear Deterrence, Nuclear Rabbis, and Nuclear Mullahs

by Ehsan Ahrari on December 4, 2012, No Comments

When it comes to nuclear deterrence, there is no difference between how it is perceived among the nuclear rabbis of Israel and the nuclear mullahs of Iran.  The nuclear rabbis are the Likudniks and other right wing politicians of Israel's official community who are committed to saving the Jewish state through the use of nuclear weapons. The nuclear mullahs are their Muslim counterparts of the Islamic republic who hold similar views about the use of nuclear weapons. The chief difference is that the perception of the nuclear rabbis is deemed sacred, valid, and legitimate in Washington and in other Western capitals, while that of the nuclear mullahs is regarded as phony.  As such, the nuclear deterrence of the mullahs is not regarded as a serious rationale for the survival of the Iranian government.  However, as a concept, nuclear deterrence is supposed to be valid, since it becomes the chief rationale forwarded by Israel and Iran to establish legitimacy of their respective nuclear wea